Should women who cry falsely continue to remain annonymous?

I`m referring to the latest case of Jack Gillett. There have been over the last few years a number of high profile cases where the man in question has been found not guilty and the women accusers have been found to be fantasists or serial liars. The men they accuse are named but they continue to remain annonymous, is this right? I think is equal to, if not worse than murder.